Get A Free Case Evaluation

We handle both personal injury and criminal defense. Please fill out the form below for your free consultation or call us at 347-620-2865.

Blog / Personal Injury

What Milek v. DPM Contracting Services Teaches Queens Drivers About Left-Turn Accidents

Left-turn accidents are among the most common causes of serious motor vehicle collisions in New York. When a driver turns left across oncoming traffic without yielding the right of way, the consequences can be devastating. A recent New York case, Milek v. DPM Contracting Services, Inc., demonstrates how courts analyze fault in these situations and why establishing liability is only one part of a successful personal injury claim.

For drivers in Queens, where busy intersections and heavy traffic create countless opportunities for left-turn collisions, this case offers important insight into how New York courts determine responsibility after an accident.

The Facts of the Case

In Milek v. DPM Contracting Services, Inc., the plaintiff sought summary judgment on the issue of liability following a motor vehicle accident. According to the plaintiff, he was traveling straight through an intersection when the defendant driver made a left turn directly into his path.

The plaintiff argued that the collision occurred because the defendant failed to yield the right of way before attempting the turn. Under New York law, drivers making left turns have a duty to ensure that the maneuver can be completed safely before crossing oncoming traffic.

The plaintiff moved for summary judgment, asking the court to determine that the defendants were legally responsible for causing the accident without the need for a trial on liability.

Why Left-Turning Drivers Face a Heavy Burden Under New York Law

New York Vehicle and Traffic Law places a significant responsibility on drivers who make left turns at intersections. A motorist intending to turn left must yield to approaching vehicles that are close enough to constitute an immediate hazard.

This rule exists because left turns are inherently dangerous. A driver crossing opposing lanes of travel must accurately judge the speed and distance of oncoming vehicles and wait until it is safe to proceed.

When a collision occurs during a left turn, courts frequently examine whether the turning driver failed to yield the right of way. If the evidence shows that the oncoming vehicle was lawfully proceeding through the intersection and had the right of way, the turning driver may be found negligent as a matter of law.

The Court's Decision

The court granted summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff on the issue of liability.

A significant factor in the decision was the defendants' failure to appear for depositions. Because the defendants did not provide testimony or evidence creating a factual dispute regarding how the accident occurred, they were unable to effectively challenge the plaintiff's version of events.

Based on the evidence presented, the court concluded that the plaintiff established that he was traveling straight through the intersection when the defendant made an unsafe left turn into his path. As a result, the plaintiff successfully demonstrated entitlement to judgment on liability.

This meant that, for purposes of the lawsuit, the defendants were deemed legally responsible for causing the crash.

Why Winning on Liability Does Not End the Case

Many accident victims assume that proving another driver caused a crash automatically guarantees compensation. However, New York's no-fault insurance system creates an additional hurdle for many injured plaintiffs.

Even after obtaining summary judgment on liability, the plaintiff in Milek still faced a separate legal issue: whether he sustained a "serious injury" under New York Insurance Law § 5102(d).

The serious injury threshold is a critical component of many New York car accident cases. To recover damages for pain and suffering, an injured person typically must demonstrate that their injuries satisfy one of the categories outlined in the statute.

Examples may include:

  • Significant limitation of use of a body function or system;
  • Permanent consequential limitation of use of a body organ or member;
  • Fractures;
  • Significant disfigurement; or
  • Certain medically determined impairments that substantially interfere with daily activities.

Because liability and injury are separate legal issues, a plaintiff can successfully establish fault while still being required to prove that their injuries meet the statutory threshold.

Lessons for Queens Drivers

Queens is home to some of the busiest intersections in New York City. Areas along Queens Boulevard, Northern Boulevard, Woodhaven Boulevard, Hillside Avenue, and other heavily traveled roadways frequently see collisions involving left-turning vehicles.

The Milek decision reinforces several important principles:

Drivers Making Left Turns Must Yield

Motorists attempting a left turn cannot simply assume they have enough time to complete the maneuver. They must yield to oncoming vehicles that have the right of way and wait until the turn can be made safely.

Evidence Matters

The plaintiff was able to establish liability because the evidence supported his version of events and the defendants failed to present contrary evidence. Police reports, witness statements, photographs, surveillance footage, and deposition testimony can all play critical roles in determining fault.

Liability Is Only One Part of a Personal Injury Case

Even when fault appears clear, injured victims must still prove the extent of their injuries and, in many cases, satisfy New York's serious injury threshold to recover non-economic damages.

Early Legal Action Can Help Preserve Important Evidence

After a left-turn accident, crucial evidence may disappear quickly. Surveillance footage may be overwritten, witnesses may become difficult to locate, and physical evidence can be lost. Prompt investigation can strengthen a victim's ability to establish both liability and damages.

Conclusion

The decision in Milek v. DPM Contracting Services, Inc. serves as a reminder that drivers who make unsafe left turns can be held liable when they fail to yield the right of way to oncoming traffic. The case also highlights an important reality of New York personal injury litigation: proving fault is often only the first step.

For Queens drivers injured in a left-turn collision, understanding how courts analyze liability and serious injury claims can be critical when pursuing compensation. While every case depends on its unique facts, Milek demonstrates how clear evidence of an unsafe left turn can establish responsibility for a crash and position an injured victim to pursue recovery under New York law.

Posted in:

Related Posts

Grauman Law P.C. graphic showing a rented moped crash scene and wrongful death claim documents in New York

Rented Moped Fatality: What Marinos v. Brahaj Teaches About Wrongful Death Claims

As electric scooters, mopeds, and app-based transportation services become increasingly common throughout New York City, accidents involving these vehicles have become more frequent. While many crashes result in serious injuries, some tragically lead to fatalities that leave families searching for answers and accountability. A recent New York case, Marinos v. Brahaj, addresses an important legal issue that arises in many modern transportation-related accidents: whether a person’s agreement to arbitrate disputes can prevent surviving family members from pursuing a wrongful death claim in court. The decision provides valuable guidance for families facing the aftermath of a fatal accident and highlights a critical distinction between personal injury claims and wrongful death actions under New York law. The Facts of the Case In Marinos v. Brahaj, the decedent rented and operated a Revel electric moped in Manhattan. According to the case, the rider was ejected from the moped and thrown into the roadway, where he was subsequently struck by a vehicle. The accident resulted in fatal injuries. Following the tragedy, the decedent's parents brought legal claims arising from the incident, including claims related to personal injury and wrongful death. The defendants sought to compel arbitration based on an agreement the decedent had allegedly accepted when renting the moped through the Revel mobile application. Like many app-based services, the rental platform included terms and conditions that contained an arbitration provision requiring certain disputes to be resolved outside of court. The central legal question became whether that arbitration agreement also applied to the wrongful death claims brought by the decedent's parents. The Growing Role of Arbitration Agreements in Modern Transportation Services Today, consumers routinely agree to digital contracts when using: Ride-share services; Scooter rental platforms; Moped-sharing services; Bike-sharing programs; Delivery applications; and Various transportation-related apps. These agreements often contain arbitration clauses that require disputes to be resolved through private arbitration rather than traditional court proceedings. Many users accept these terms by simply clicking a button within an application, often without reading the full agreement. As a result, arbitration provisions have become increasingly important in litigation involving app-based transportation services. However, the existence of an arbitration agreement does not automatically resolve every legal issue, particularly when family members bring claims after a fatal accident. Understanding the Difference Between Personal Injury and Wrongful Death Claims One of the most important aspects of Marinos is the distinction between personal injury claims and wrongful death claims. Although they often arise from the same accident, these causes of action are legally different. Personal Injury Claims A personal injury claim generally belongs to the injured individual. The claim seeks compensation for losses suffered by that person, including: Medical expenses; Pain and suffering; Lost wages; Disability; Loss of enjoyment of life; and Other accident-related damages. Because these claims belong to the injured person, agreements signed by that individual may affect how those claims are resolved. Wrongful Death Claims A wrongful death claim is different. Under New York law, a wrongful death action is brought on behalf of eligible family members or distributees who suffer losses as a result of the death. These claims are separate from the decedent's personal injury rights and seek damages associated with the losses suffered by surviving family members. This distinction became the key issue in Marinos v. Brahaj. What Did the Court Decide? The Appellate Division held that the parents' wrongful death claim was not subject to the arbitration clause that the decedent allegedly agreed to when renting the Revel moped. The court explained that the wrongful death cause of action belongs to the distributees rather than to the decedent. Because the wrongful death claim is legally distinct from the personal injury claim that belonged to the rider, the arbitration agreement could not automatically bind the parents with respect to their independent wrongful death rights. As a result, the wrongful death claim was permitted to proceed outside of arbitration. The decision reinforces the principle that wrongful death actions are separate legal claims belonging to surviving family members, not merely extensions of the decedent's personal injury claim. Why This Decision Matters The Marinos ruling has implications far beyond moped accidents. Many companies increasingly rely on arbitration provisions in consumer agreements. These clauses frequently appear in: Transportation apps; Vehicle rental agreements; Subscription services; Online marketplaces; Delivery platforms; and Technology-based services. The case demonstrates that courts may distinguish between claims belonging to the individual who signed an agreement and claims belonging to surviving family members after a fatal accident. For families, this distinction can significantly affect where and how a case is litigated. The Rise of Scooter and Moped Accidents in New York City Micromobility services have transformed transportation throughout New York City. Electric scooters, bicycles, and mopeds offer convenient alternatives to traditional transportation, particularly in densely populated neighborhoods. However, these vehicles also expose riders to significant risks. Unlike occupants of passenger vehicles, riders generally lack substantial protection during a collision. Common causes of serious scooter and moped accidents include: Vehicle collisions; Roadway defects; Driver inattention; Unsafe lane changes; Opening vehicle doors; Traffic congestion; and Loss of vehicle control. Because riders are largely unprotected, injuries can be catastrophic. What Families Should Know After a Fatal Accident When a fatal accident occurs, families are often overwhelmed by grief while simultaneously facing legal, financial, and practical challenges. Potential issues may include: Funeral expenses; Medical bills; Loss of financial support; Investigation of the accident; Insurance claims; Potential litigation; and Questions regarding liability. Cases involving rental vehicles, app-based services, or transportation platforms may also involve complex contractual issues, including arbitration provisions and liability limitations. The Marinos decision illustrates why these cases often require careful legal analysis before assumptions are made about a family's rights. Why This Case Is Especially Relevant in Queens Queens residents regularly encounter: Revel mopeds; Citi Bikes; Electric scooters; Ride-share vehicles; Delivery riders; and Other app-based transportation services. Busy corridors in neighborhoods such as Astoria, Long Island City, Jackson Heights, Flushing, Jamaica, and Forest Hills see substantial micromobility traffic every day. As these transportation options continue to grow in popularity, legal disputes involving rental agreements, accident liability, and wrongful death claims are likely to become increasingly common. The principles discussed in Marinos therefore have direct relevance to families throughout Queens and New York City. Key Takeaways From Marinos v. Brahaj The case provides several important lessons: Wrongful Death Claims Are Legally Distinct A wrongful death action belongs to surviving distributees and is separate from the decedent's personal injury claim. Arbitration Clauses Do Not Always Control Every Claim The existence of an arbitration agreement does not automatically determine the rights of surviving family members. App-Based Transportation Services Create Unique Legal Issues Rental agreements, mobile applications, and digital contracts can significantly affect litigation following a serious accident. Families May Have Independent Rights Even when an injured person entered into a contractual agreement, surviving family members may retain separate legal claims under New York law. Conclusion The decision in Marinos v. Brahaj highlights an important aspect of New York wrongful death law. Although the decedent rented a Revel moped through an application containing an arbitration provision, the Appellate Division determined that the parents' wrongful death claim belonged to them as distributees and was not automatically subject to the arbitration agreement. For families coping with the loss of a loved one in a scooter, moped, bicycle, ride-share, or other transportation-related accident, the case serves as a reminder that wrongful death claims often involve rights that are legally distinct from those held by the deceased person. As transportation technology continues to evolve throughout New York City, these legal principles will remain increasingly important for accident victims and their families.

Grauman Law P.C. graphic showing an injured accident victim and steps to protect your rights after a serious accident

How to Protect Your Rights After a Serious Accident

In the days after serious car accidents here in Queens, victims typically start to have questions about their rights and how to protect them. Here's what you need to know. Protecting Your Rights After Car Accidents in Queens Stick to Your Medical Plan Follow every recommendation from your doctors and specialists, even if you start to think you're feeling better and would rather stop. Attend physical therapy, complete all prescribed tests, and report new or changing symptoms right away. This creates a medical record that clearly links your injuries to the crash, and it also protects you from unfair accusations (insurers like to challenge claims when the medical treatment stops and restarts). Start Keeping a Journal A simple daily journal is more effective evidence of what you've suffered than trying to talk about it all weeks or months later. Write down every day how much pain you felt, whether you had difficulty sleeping, any limitations you had with respect to work or chores, and the emotional effects of it all. This provides evidence that medical records and bills can't quantify. Get Organized Find and organize every piece of paper related to the crash, and act as quickly as you can. Create one folder for medical bills, insurance statements, prescription receipts, and visit summaries. Create another for your pay stubs or employer letters that show time you've missed from work. In a different file, include receipts for transportation to appointments, home modifications, or extra help around the house. Finally, keep a file with all communication you have with the insurance company and your lawyer. Watch What You Say to Insurers Notify your own insurer if you have not already done so, but limit your statements to just the basic facts. Always decline to give any recorded statements until you've talked to your lawyer, and never accept an early settlement offer without legal advice. Once you sign a release, you usually cannot reopen the claim even if it turns out that your damages are greater than you expected. Keep Evidence If your vehicle has not yet been repaired or sold, keep it intact so experts can examine it later. Request that any event data recorder information stay available. Get the information of any witnesses to your lawyer so your lawyer can confirm their willingness to speak, and give your lawyer all the information you have or remember about businesses or property owners near where the accident took place. Your lawyer can send a letter asking them to hold any surveillance video that may still exist. Don't Discuss Your Case Stay off social media when it comes to the crash or your recovery, and remember that any photos or comments that imply you're active can be taken out of context and used to argue that injuries aren't very serious. Do not discuss the details of the case with anyone except your doctors and legal counsel. Talk to a Lawyer Contact Grauman Law P.C. in Kew Gardens or Forest Hills as soon as possible to speak with a team that has over 50 years of experience representing the people of Queens and all of NYC.

Grauman Law P.C. graphic showing an injured man with a head bandage and the long-term effects of severe head trauma

The Long-Term Effects of Severe Head Trauma

Severe head trauma after an accident can leave lasting effects on both the body and mind. Families in Nassau County who face a traumatic brain injury often have to deal with years of medical and daily life and work challenges. Traumatic Brain Injury Outcomes The first hours after a blow or jolt that damages brain tissue tend to dominate the medical attention, but the full cost of that injury frequently reveals itself only after the initial, acute crisis has passed. Five years after such an event, more than half of those still living remain moderately or severely disabled, and a similar share who once held jobs can no longer work. One in three still needs help with everyday tasks. Ability to Manage Life Memory, attention, processing speed, and the capacity to plan or shift from one task to another often remain impaired for a long time after these injuries, and cognitive change can be the most stubborn and far-reaching consequence. Studies that follow survivors for two years and beyond show that those with the gravest injuries fall further behind their peers on measures of general intellect and executive skill rather than catching up. Physical Complications Physical complications frequently persist as chronic conditions, like post-traumatic epilepsy (which appears in roughly 1/5th of survivors), balance problems, headaches, loss of smell or taste, visual disturbances, and sleep disruption. These are all common enough in survivors that they become chronic conditions rather than symptoms you can expect to improve with time. Hydrocephalus, infections, and damage to blood vessels that later raise stroke risk can all be present and add further complexity to the prognosis. Emotional Life Depression, anxiety, irritability, impulsivity, and reduced empathy appear in traumatic brain injury victims at rates well above those seen in the general population, and these often intensify rather than fade. An umbrella review of more than thirty million participants found elevated risks for psychotic disorders, attention-deficit conditions, suicide, and later dementia. These psychiatric and neurodegenerative associations often don't appear immediately, either. Hormonal Changes The pituitary gland sits at the base of the skull and is therefore vulnerable to impact. It can lose function after the injury, and that can mean hormonal disruption which worsens fatigue, muscle loss, cognitive fog, and emotional instability for years unless it is specifically tested for. Growth hormone deficiency is the most frequent finding, followed by shortages of sex hormones, thyroid hormone, and cortisol. Effects on Nassau County Victims and Families Because these injuries can continue to evolve rather than just resolve, families must arrange ongoing medical surveillance, rehabilitation, and practical support while they also plan for changing needs in housing, transportation, finances, and daily care. Legal questions about the proper compensation for all these costs over a lifetime can be heated and contested when the injury is due to the negligence of someone else. If you or someone close to you is living with the effects of severe head trauma, contact Grauman Law in Kew Gardens, NY for a free consultation. We've been serving Nassau County and New York City for nearly two decades.